Available online at ajdhs.com

Asian Journal of Dental and Health Sciences

Open Access to Dental and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2026 The   Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

From Awareness to Action: Strengthening Breast Cancer Control Through Public Health Intervention

* Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu ^1,2

¹ Division of Haematology, Department of Biomedical and Laboratory Science, Africa University, Zimbabwe.

² The Division of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

 

 

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, accounting for over 2.3 million new cases and nearly 685,000 deaths in 2020 alone. Despite advancements in diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care, outcomes remain highly unequal, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where late-stage diagnosis, limited access to quality healthcare, and resource constraints contribute to disproportionately high mortality rates ^1-2. Public health interventions play a critical role in bridging these disparities. While awareness campaigns have raised knowledge about risk factors, early warning signs, and the benefits of early detection, there is often a gap between knowledge and action. Awareness alone does not guarantee timely screening, prompt diagnosis, or adherence to treatment. Therefore, effective breast cancer control requires strategies that translate knowledge into measurable actions within communities, healthcare systems, and policy frameworks ^3-5.

Integrating education, screening programs, community engagement, policy advocacy, and health system strengthening is essential for creating a comprehensive, actionable framework for breast cancer control. Educational campaigns should be culturally sensitive and tailored to address local beliefs, health literacy, and gender dynamics. Screening programs—ranging from mammography and clinical breast examination to mobile health initiatives—must be accessible and integrated into primary healthcare to ensure sustainability. Community engagement empowers individuals and local networks to participate actively in health-seeking behaviors, while policy advocacy and system strengthening provide the structural support necessary to sustain interventions ^6-10. This review explores the strategies, successes, and challenges in moving from awareness to action in breast cancer control, highlighting evidence-based interventions that have improved early detection, treatment access, and survivorship outcomes across diverse populations. By synthesizing current knowledge, this narrative emphasizes the need for a multipronged, context-sensitive approach that aligns community education, service delivery, and policy measures to reduce the global burden of breast cancer.

 

Awareness and Knowledge Dissemination

Raising awareness remains the foundation of any effective breast cancer control strategy. Public health campaigns have traditionally focused on increasing knowledge about risk factors, such as age, family history, hormonal exposure, and lifestyle influences, as well as the early warning signs of breast cancer, including palpable lumps, nipple discharge, and skin changes. Awareness initiatives also emphasize the benefits of early detection through methods such as mammography, clinical breast examination (CBE), and breast self-examination ^11-12. Evidence shows that knowledge alone, however, is insufficient to drive meaningful health behaviors. Cultural beliefs, misconceptions, stigma surrounding cancer, and low health literacy often impede the translation of awareness into timely action. For instance, women may recognize the importance of screening but delay seeking care due to fear, fatalistic attitudes, or social constraints. Public health interventions must therefore go beyond information dissemination, addressing these barriers through context-specific strategies that foster engagement and empower individuals to act ^13-15.

Community-based education programs have emerged as effective tools for bridging the gap between knowledge and behavior. Peer-led interventions, health talks in community centers, school-based programs, and mass media campaigns tailored to local cultural contexts have been shown to improve awareness, shift perceptions, and encourage proactive health-seeking behavior. In low-resource settings, integrating breast health education into broader maternal and child health services increases reach and sustainability ^16-18. Digital platforms and mobile health technologies also offer innovative avenues for awareness dissemination. SMS reminders, social media campaigns, and tele-education have successfully complemented traditional approaches, particularly in reaching younger populations and remote communities. These technologies can provide personalized information, prompt screening appointments, and reinforce educational messages, enhancing the likelihood that knowledge leads to concrete action ^19-20.

Screening Programs and Early Detection

Screening is a cornerstone of effective breast cancer control, as it enables the detection of tumors at an earlier, more treatable stage, thereby reducing mortality and improving survival outcomes. Established screening modalities include mammography, ultrasonography, and clinical breast examination (CBE), each with distinct advantages depending on population characteristics, resource availability, and healthcare infrastructure ^21-22. Evidence from high-resource settings demonstrates that organized mammography screening programs can reduce breast cancer mortality by 20–30%, particularly among women aged 50–69 years. In these contexts, population-based initiatives, combined with robust follow-up systems and quality assurance protocols, ensure timely diagnosis and treatment. However, such programs require substantial financial, technological, and human resources, making them challenging to implement in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) ^23-24.

In resource-limited settings, alternative strategies have proven effective. Clinical breast examination, often conducted by trained community health workers or nurses, provides a cost-effective screening tool that can reach women who lack access to mammography. Mobile health clinics and outreach programs further expand coverage by bringing screening services directly to underserved or rural communities. These approaches are particularly valuable when integrated into existing primary healthcare platforms, maternal health programs, or community health initiatives, ensuring sustainability and continuity of care ^25-26. Beyond accessibility, screening programs must address barriers related to awareness, cultural beliefs, and social stigma. Studies show that women who understand the importance of early detection and perceive screening as culturally acceptable are more likely to participate. Therefore, public health messaging must reinforce the benefits of early detection while simultaneously reducing fear and misconceptions about breast cancer ^27-28. The effectiveness of screening is also closely linked to the availability of timely diagnostic and treatment services. Screening without follow-up can create a false sense of security and may exacerbate disparities. Coordinated referral networks, patient navigation systems, and integration with national cancer control programs are essential to ensure that screening translates into actionable outcomes ²⁹.

Community Engagement and Participatory Approaches

Community engagement is a critical bridge between awareness and actionable health behaviors, empowering individuals and communities to take an active role in breast cancer prevention, early detection, and care. Public health interventions that involve communities in planning, implementing, and evaluating programs are more likely to be culturally sensitive, widely accepted, and sustainable [30]. Participatory approaches enable communities to identify local barriers to breast cancer screening and treatment, co-develop tailored interventions, and foster collective ownership of health initiatives. Examples include community health worker programs, breast health clubs, and faith-based initiatives, which combine education with practical support such as facilitating clinical breast examinations, arranging transportation to screening centers, and providing follow-up reminders. By leveraging local knowledge and social networks, these programs increase the likelihood that awareness translates into concrete health-seeking behavior ³¹.

Engaging community leaders, opinion influencers, and peer educators enhances program credibility and reach, particularly in settings where social norms and cultural beliefs may hinder open discussions about breast health. For instance, faith-based interventions in rural communities have successfully incorporated breast cancer education into routine community activities, increasing participation in screening and reducing stigma associated with the disease ³². Furthermore, community engagement fosters empowerment and self-efficacy, enabling women to make informed decisions about their health. When communities actively participate in program design and implementation, interventions are better adapted to local contexts, including language, literacy levels, gender dynamics, and cultural practices. This bottom-up approach complements top-down policy initiatives, ensuring that national or regional breast cancer control programs resonate at the grassroots level ³³. Digital platforms and social media further enhance participatory engagement by facilitating peer-to-peer education, support groups, and interactive health promotion campaigns. These tools enable communities to share experiences, disseminate culturally relevant information, and encourage collective action in ways that traditional campaigns alone cannot achieve.

Policy Advocacy and Health System Strengthening

While awareness, screening, and community engagement are vital, sustainable breast cancer control requires robust policy frameworks and strong health systems to translate knowledge into tangible outcomes. Policy advocacy serves as a critical lever to create an enabling environment that supports early detection, equitable access to treatment, and long-term survivorship care. Effective advocacy involves engaging stakeholders—including government agencies, non-governmental organizations, healthcare professionals, and patient groups to influence policies that prioritize breast cancer prevention and care. Examples include legislation that mandates coverage for screening and diagnostic services, funding for national cancer control programs, and initiatives that subsidize treatment for underserved populations. Policies that address workforce development, infrastructure expansion, and data-driven surveillance further strengthen system capacity to manage breast cancer comprehensively ³⁴.

Health system strengthening complements policy efforts by improving service delivery, coordination, and quality of care. Key components include training healthcare professionals in early detection and oncology care, developing referral networks to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment, and integrating breast cancer services into primary healthcare platforms. Investment in diagnostic infrastructure, such as imaging and pathology services, ensures that screening programs lead to accurate and actionable outcomes rather than delayed or missed diagnoses ³⁵. Furthermore, implementing patient navigation systems and electronic health records enhances follow-up care and continuity, addressing one of the critical barriers to effective intervention: loss to follow-up. Strong health systems also enable the collection and analysis of epidemiological data, which informs policy decisions, resource allocation, and targeted interventions in high-risk communities ³³. Global and national collaborations amplify these efforts. Partnerships with international organizations, research institutions, and advocacy groups facilitate knowledge exchange, capacity building, and resource mobilization, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Such multisectoral cooperation ensures that policy and system-level interventions are contextually relevant, evidence-based, and scalable ^34-35.

Conclusion

Strengthening breast cancer control requires moving beyond awareness to coordinated, actionable public health interventions. While educational campaigns increase knowledge of risk factors and early detection, their impact is maximized only when paired with accessible screening programs, active community engagement, supportive policy frameworks, and a robust healthcare system. Evidence from diverse global settings demonstrates that integrating these strategies tailored to cultural, social, and economic contexts enhances early detection, improves treatment access, and ultimately reduces morbidity and mortality. Community-driven approaches, participatory engagement, and digital innovations empower individuals to act on knowledge, while policy advocacy and health system strengthening provide the structural support needed for sustainability and scalability. Translating awareness into action is therefore not the result of isolated interventions but a product of comprehensive, multipronged strategies that align education, services, and policy.

Acknowledgements: Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest: The author declares that there no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions: Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu performed the following: Conceptualization, Methodology, Visualization, Validity, Supervision, Writing and Editing the Manuscript. 

Source of Support: Nil 

Funding: The author declared that this study has received no financial support. 

Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement: No data was generated in this narrative review article. 

Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, Mafra A, Singh D, Laversanne M, Vignat J, Gralow JR, Cardoso F, Siesling S, Soerjomataram I. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022; 66:15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010

PMid:36084384 PMCid:PMC9465273

2. Lei S, Zheng R, Zhang S, Wang S, Chen R, Sun K, Zeng H, Zhou J, Wei W. Global patterns of breast cancer incidence and mortality: A population-based cancer registry data analysis from 2000 to 2020. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021;41(11):1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12207 nPMid:34399040 PMCid:PMC8626596

3. Obeagu EI. N2 Neutrophils and Tumor Progression in Breast Cancer: Molecular Pathways and Implications. Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2025; 17: 639-651. https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S542787 PMid:40718361 PMCid:PMC12296999

4. Obeagu EI, Obeagu GU. Exploring the profound link: Breastfeeding's impact on alleviating the burden of breast cancer - A review. Medicine, 2024; 103(15), e37695. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000037695 PMid:38608095 PMCid:PMC11018178

5. Wheeler SB, Reeder-Hayes KE, Carey LA. Disparities in breast cancer treatment and outcomes: biological, social, and health system determinants and opportunities for research. Oncologist. 2013;18(9):986-993. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0243 PMid:23939284 PMCid:PMC3780646

6. Obeagu EI, Obeagu GU. Lymphocyte infiltration in breast cancer: A promising prognostic indicator. Medicine, 2024; 103(49), e40845. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040845 PMid:39654199 PMCid:PMC11631027

7. Obeagu EI, Obeagu GU. Exploring neutrophil functionality in breast cancer progression: A review. Medicine, 2024; 103(13), e37654. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000037654 PMid:38552040 PMCid:PMC10977563

8. Bradley CJ, Kitchen S, Bhatia S, Bynum J, Darien G, Lichtenfeld JL, Oyer R, Shulman LN, Sheldon LK. Policies and Practices to Address Cancer's Long-Term Adverse Consequences. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(8):1065-https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djac086 PMid:35438165 PMCid:PMC93604639. Obeagu EI , Isiko I, N1 and N2 Neutrophils in Breast Cancer: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance, and Therapeutic Potential, International Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharma Research. 2025;11(2):1-11 https://doi.org/10.22270/ijmspr.v11i2.141

10. Gbenonsi GY, Martini J, Mahieu C. An analytical framework for breast cancer public policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: results from a comprehensive literature review and an adapted policy Delphi. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1535. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18937-5 PMid:38849808 PMCid:PMC11157826

11. Espina C, Soerjomataram I, Forman D, Martín-Moreno JM. Cancer prevention policy in the EU: Best practices are now well recognised; no reason for countries to lag behind. J Cancer Policy. 2018; 18:40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpo.2018.09.001 PMid:30510896 PMCid:PMC6255794

12. Obeagu EI. The selenium paradox friend or foe in breast cancer? Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025;87(9):5569-5577. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003464 PMid:40901095 PMCid:PMC12401276

13. Obeagu EI , Isiko I, N1 and N2 Neutrophil Polarization in Breast Cancer: Predictive Value for Treatment Outcomes, International Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharma Research. 2025;11(2):12-20 https://doi.org/10.22270/ijmspr.v11i2.142

14. Shetty MK. Screening for breast cancer with mammography: current status and an overview. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010;1(3):218-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-010-0014-x PMid:22693368 PMCid:PMC3244246

15. Ponce-Chazarri L, Ponce-Blandón JA, Immordino P, Giordano A, Morales F. Barriers to Breast Cancer-Screening Adherence in Vulnerable Populations. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(3):604. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030604 PMid:36765561 PMCid:PMC9913751

16. Obeagu EI. The nutritional equation: decoding diet's influence on breast cancer risk and progression - a perspective. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025;87(9):5528-5534. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003612 PMid:40901208 PMCid:PMC12401440

17. Gbenonsi GY, Martini J, Mahieu C. An analytical framework for breast cancer public policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: results from a comprehensive literature review and an adapted policy Delphi. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1535. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18937-5 PMid:38849808 PMCid:PMC11157826

18. Obeagu EI, Maibouge Tanko MS. Iron metabolism in breast cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic implications: a narrative review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025;87(6):3403-3409. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003173 PMid:40486542 PMCid:PMC12140789

19. Wilkinson L, Gathani T. Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern. Br J Radiol. 2022;95(1130):20211033. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211033 PMid:34905391 PMCid:PMC8822551

20. Obeagu EI. Thromboinflammatory pathways in breast cancer: clinical and molecular insights into venous thromboembolism risk - a narrative review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025;87(9):5822-5828. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003644 PMid:40901130 PMCid:PMC12401306

21. Kitaw TA, Tilahun BD, Zemariam AB, Getie A, Bizuayehu MA, Haile RN. The financial toxicity of cancer: unveiling global burden and risk factors - a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2025;10(2): e017133. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017133 PMid:39929536 PMCid:PMC11815433

22. Obeagu EI, Obeagu GU. Predictive models and biomarkers for survival in stage III breast cancer: a review of clinical applications and future directions. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024;86(10):5980-5987. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002517 PMid:39359789 PMCid:PMC11444610

23. Bhatia S, Landier W, Paskett ED, Peters KB, Merrill JK, Phillips J, Osarogiagbon RU. Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(7):940-952. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djac030 PMid:35148389 PMCid:PMC9275775

24. Malope SD, Norris SA, Joffe M. Culture, community, and cancer: understandings of breast cancer from a non-lived experience among women living in Soweto. BMC women's health, 2024; 24(1), 594. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03431-2 PMid:39506786 PMCid:PMC11539428

25. Sítima G, Galhardo-Branco C, Reis-Pina P. Equity of access to palliative care: a scoping review. Int J Equity Health. 2024;23(1):248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02321-1 PMid:39581966 PMCid:PMC11587758

26. Kreuter MW, Thompson T, McQueen A, Garg R. Addressing Social Needs in Health Care Settings: Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities for Public Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021; 42:329-344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102204 PMid:33326298 PMCid:PMC8240195

27. Aslam A, Mustafa AG, Hussnain A, Saeed H, Nazar F, Amjad M, Mahmood A, Afzal A, Fatima A, Alkhalidi DK. Assessing Awareness, Attitude, and Practices of Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention Among General Public and Physicians in Pakistan: A Nation with the Highest Breast Cancer Incidence in Asia. Int J Breast Cancer. 2024; 2024:2128388. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2128388 PMid:39372363 PMCid:PMC11455591

28. Alrosan AZ, Alwidyan T, Heilat GB, Rataan AO, Madae'en S, Alrosan K, Awwad FS, Ali T. Knowledge and awareness of breast cancer signs and symptoms among Jordanian women. Future Sci OA. 2025;11(1):2510871. https://doi.org/10.1080/20565623.2025.2510871 PMid:40435211 PMCid:PMC12123941

29. Turkson-Ocran RN, Nkimbeng M, Erol D, Hwang DA, Aryitey AA, Hughes V. Strategies for Providing Culturally Sensitive Care to Diverse Populations. J Christ Nurs. 2022 Jan;39(1):16-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/CNJ.0000000000000900 PMid:34860764 PMCid:PMC9976714

30. Wakefield, MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010;376(9748):1261-1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60809-4 PMid:20933263 PMCid:PMC4248563

31. AlMutawah K, Taqi G, Radhwan S, AlMutairi A, AlHussainan A, Faraj M, AlBaloul AH. Knowledge and awareness of breast cancer symptoms, risk factors, and screening barriers among women in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2025;25(1):448. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03994-8 PMid:41013463 PMCid:PMC12465561

32. Gbenonsi GY, Martini J, Mahieu C. An analytical framework for breast cancer public policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: results from a comprehensive literature review and an adapted policy Delphi. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1535. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18937-5 PMid:38849808 PMCid:PMC11157826

33. Al Hasan SM, Bennett DL, Toriola AT. Screening programmes and breast cancer mortality: an observational study of 194 countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2025;103(8):470-483. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.292529 PMid:40766731 PMCid:PMC12322760

34. Iqbal J. Women-Centric Breast Cancer Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Challenges, Solutions, and a Roadmap for Equity. Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec; 32:10732748251378804. https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251378804 PMid:40956982 PMCid:PMC12441264

35. Caldwell HAT, Yusuf J, Carrea C, Conrad P, Embrett M, Fierlbeck K, Hajizadeh M, Kirk SFL, Rothfus M, Sampalli T, Sim SM, Tomblin Murphy G, Williams L. Strategies and indicators to integrate health equity in health service and delivery systems in high-income countries: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth. 2024;22(6):949-1070. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00051 PMid:38632975 PMCid:PMC11163892