Review on Molecular Modelling in Chemistry Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22270/ajdhs.v2i4.26Keywords:
Molecular models, Acidity, Amides, Basicity, Electrostatic potentialAbstract
Molecular models derived from results of quantum-chemical calculations present an important category of didactic instruments in chemistry education. These models can be used especially as tools for supporting the students’ understanding by visual learning, which can adequately address complexity of many chemical topics, incorporate appropriate didactic principles, as well as utilize the benefits brought up by the actual information technology. The proposed molecular models are non-trivial examples of didactic application of computational chemistry techniques in illustration of electron interactions in amidic group, namely the interaction of the free electron pair on the nitrogen atom with the carbonyl group and also the interaction of atoms in the amide group with other surrounding atoms in the molecule. By these molecular models it is possible to explain acid-base properties of amides applying knowledge of electron density distribution in the molecules and the resulting electrostatic potential. Presentation of the structure and properties of the amides within education is important also for the reason that amidic functions are involved in many important natural substances (e.g. proteins, peptides, nucleic acids or alkaloids), synthetic macromolecular substances (e.g. Silon) or pharmaceutical preparations (e.g. paracetamol). This paper investigated the effect of using different types of models while teaching organic chemistry on student understanding of new concepts and the spatial structure of new molecules, as well as preference of a particular model type and illustrates the possibilities of computer-assisted molecular modelling in supporting chemistry teaching and learning.
Keywords: Molecular models, Acidity, Amides, Basicity, Electrostatic potential
References
Johnstone A H. The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to a changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education.1993; 70(9):701-705. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed070p701
Gabel D. Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: a look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education.1999; 76(4):548-554. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p548
Hinton M E, Nakhleh MB. Student's microscopic, macroscopic and symbolic representations of chemical reactions. The Chemical Educator.1999; 4(4):1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897990325a
Barnea N, Dori Y J. Computerized molecular modeling as a tool to improve chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences.1996; 36(4):629-636. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci950122o
Justi R, Gilbert JK. Models and Modelling in Chemical Education. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice.2002; pp. 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47977-X_3
Barnea N. Teaching and Learning about Chemistry and Modelling with a Computer managed Modelling System. In J. K. Gilbert, & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing Models in Science Education. 2000; pp. 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1_16
Jalonen E, Lundell J, Aksela M. Molekyylimallinnus lukion kemian opetuksessa. (Molecular modelling in the chemistry teaching of upper secondary school). In M. Aksela & M. Montonen (Eds.), Uusia lähestymistapoja kemian opetukseen perusopetuksesta korkeakouluihin. 2007; 148-154.
Barnea N, Dori YJ. Computerized molecular modeling as a tool to improve chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 1996; 36(4): 629-636. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci950122o
Lundell J, Aksela M. Molekyylimallinnus kemian opetuksessa, osa 1: Molekyylimallinnus ja kemian opetus, Dimensio. 2003; 67(5):47-49.
Pernaa J, Aksela M, Lundell J. Kemian opettajien käsityksiä molekyylimallinnuksen käytöstä opetuksessa. (Finnish school teachers' views about the usage of molecular modelling in teaching). In M. Aksela & J. Pernaa (Eds.), Arkipäivän kemia, kokeellisuus ja työturvallisuus kemian opetuksessa perusopetuksesta korkeakouluihin: IV Valtakunnalliset kemian opetuksen päivät. 2009; 195-204.
Jain M, Jain A, Khare B, Jain DK, Khan R, Jain D. An Update on the Recent Emergence of Candida auris. Asian Journal of Dental and Health Sciences. 2022; 2(1):14-9. https://doi.org/10.22270/ajdhs.v2i1.11
Aksela M, Lundell J. Computer-based molecular modelling: Finnish school teachers' experiences and views. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 2008; 9:301-308. https://doi.org/10.1039/B818464J
Aksela M, Lundell J. Kemian opettajien kokemuksia tietokoneavusteisesta molekyylimallinnuksesta. (Finnish school teachers' experiences about computer-based molecular modelling). In M. Aksela & M. Montonen (Eds.), Uusia lähestymistapoja kemian opetukseen perusopetuksesta korkeakouluihin. 2007; 226-247.
Dori YJ, Barak M. Virtual and physical molecular modeling: fostering model perception and spatial understanding. Educational Technology and Society. 2001; 4(1): 61-74.
Walton A. A Review of the use of both skeletal and space-filling models. Progress in Stereochemistry. 1968; 4:335-336.
Khatri S, Jain DK. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD): past, present and future. CIBTech Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2018; 7(4):1-25.
Hardwicke AJ. Using molecular models to teach chemistry. Part 1: modeling molecules. School and Science Review. 19995; 77:59-64.
Clarke FH. New Skeletal space-filling models: a model of an enzyme active site. Journal of Chemical Education. 1997; 54:230-235. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed054p230
Toulmin S. The Philosophy of Science: An Introduction. New York: Harper and Row.1953.
Bagdonis AS, Salisbury DF. Development and validation of models in instructional design. Educational Technology. 1994; 34:26-32.
Tamir P. Traning Teachers to Teach Effectively in the Laboratory. Science Education. 1989; 73:59-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730730106
Ben-Zvi N. Genut S. Uses and limitations of scienctific modls: the perioduc table as an inductive tool. International Journal of Science Education. 1998; 20; 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200307
Gilbert JK, Boulter CJ. Learning science through models and modeling. in Fraser BJ and Tobin, KG (eds). International Handbook of Science Education. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht/Boston/London. 1998; 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_4
Baker RS, Talley HL. Visualization skills as a component of aptitude for chemistry - A construct validation study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1974; 11: 95-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660110203
Barak M, Dori YJ. Model Perception and understanding the spatial structure of organic molecules by high school chemistry students. Science teacher's education toward the new millenium, Technion, Haifa, Israel. 1999.
Eliot JK, Hauptman A. Different dimensions of spatial ability. Studies in Science Education. 1981; 8:45- 66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268108559886
Hammond GS, Osteryoung J, Crawford TH, Gray HB. Models in Chemical Science. Benjamin Inc., 2nd Edition, Menlo Park, CA.1972.
Harrison AG, Treagust DF. Mental Models. Science Education. 1996; 80:508- 534. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<509::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-F
Osborne RJ, Gilbert JK. The Use of Models in Science Teaching. The School and Science Review. 1980; 62:57-67.
Peterson QR. Some reflections on the use and abuse of molecular models. Journal of Chemical Education. 1970; 47(1):24-29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed047p24
Nakhleh MB, Krajcik SJ. Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students' understanding of acid, base and ph concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1994; 31:1077-1096. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660311004
Dori YJ, Hameiri M. The mole environment study ware: applying multidimensional analysis to quantitative chemistry problems. International Journal of Science Education. 1998; 20:317-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200305
Raghavan K, Glaser R. Model based analysis and reasoning in science: the MARS curriculum. Science Education. 1995; 79:37-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790104
Williamson VM, Abraham MR. The Effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1995; 32:521-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320508
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citations
Copyright (c) 2022 Itendra Singh Rajpoot, Hemant Patel, Rahul Singh Thakur, Basant Khare, Anushree Jain, Prateek Kumar Jain, Bhupendra Singh Thakur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.